We live in sophisticated systems often best understood through psychological inquiry into inter-referential mythologies. The more we are aware of this process enough to participate in creation the more culture is made on purpose. I have practiced, am now, and aspire to be a better Culturesmith. This is a collection of existing evidence of public contributions to the culture-making process, with comments and original work from those who have asked to be represented here.

Sunday, July 1, 2007

Metashamanism

I hope to develop Daniel C. Noel's idea which he referred to as neoshamanism in contradistinction to the creations of folks currently using that term.

A big part of the dissertation I'm writing and community we are building has to do with shifting in perception back and forth between the literal (myths of Progress, Science, and mechanized Industrialism) and the metaphorical (myths of Soul, Humanities, Poetics). Dr. Dan Noel was convinced that the contemporary search with which many folks are identifying themselves as "spiritual but not religious" has to do with a desire for a more conscious metaphoricality in relationship to spirit and soul realms, a more purposeful fiction-consciousness that acknowledges the overlaps of the poetic, psychological, literary, (spiritualigious?spiritualicious :) , and the fundamental systemic presupposition of unconsciousness - that which may be related to through imagination but never fully known - shared by all these approaches.

In wondering in mystery, I am interested in a transition from both the power-base clergy authenticated by apostles of a dominating idea and the "native medicine man" sprung fully clad from the head of a colonizing Nostalgia. Both are invested by the contemporary scientistic imagination in knowing something, some sympathetic prestidigitation, that gives access to some place inaccessible to "normal" people, the existence of whom I find dubious at best. (See Ernest Becker "Everyman as Pervert: an essay on the pathology of normalcy" if at all possible - in his "Angel in Armor").

I wonder if Noel meant to imply not a neoshamanism, though that is the word he chose, but something less Nouveau that follows our revisioning of what is native to the spirit and soul in a contemporary contextlessness seriously lacking in nativity. I thought about referring to this imagination in creative motion as post-shamanism but heard Thomas Holcroft's admonition ringing in my ears that "The past is a guidepost, not a hitching post."Still post-shamanism might work, or how about metashamanism? The metashaman is certain to know some things that I don't, but the reverse is also guaranteed to be true. What attracts me is that she knows differently some how, in some way that I can feel at first and then understand, but which requires some sustained practice to continue deeply enough to apply. It is the way of her knowing, the art in her process that I find compelling. She moves by way of the imagination, making fiction, making community that is aware of itself dreaming its own consciousness, identity, purpose, and culture.

Here is a place metashamanism was mentioned before me with a different but parallel inflection. I'll have to look for where Joseph Campbell used the phrase "shaman of shaman". This piece is from an excellent article on storytelling and writing. I recommend it to your attention.


Further Reading on the Craft of Storytelling
Okay, so you've decided that you want to get serious about learning the craft of storytelling. Maybe you've even set your sights on creating an epic myth, in the tradition of Star Wars, Dune, The Lord of the Rings, The Matrix, or even The Odyssey or Gilgamesh. Now what? Part of your motivation involves personal goals, like proving your value to yourself and the world, or earning a living doing something you care about. Those are valid goals! Part of your motivation involves more communal goals, like finding the most productive way for you to give back to the world, or to create a story that nourishes young people the way your favorite stories nourished you. How do you entwine those goals together, to create a synergy between your animal and spiritual/artistic impulses? How do you create a story which heals those pieces of you which aren't yet as healthy as they might be, then share that recipe for self-healing with the world?

Joseph Campbell (1904-1987) observed that virtually all "precivilized" tribal people have a witch-doctor, or shaman, who functions as the intermediary between the known and the unknown (especially the divine). We modern "civilized" people like to flatter ourselves by imagining that we have outgrown the primitive need for a shaman, but Campbell argues that the reverse is true, that the "shamanic function" has vastly proliferated, splintering into two main groups: the scientist/engineer deals with the "logos," or rational use of symbols, while priests and artists deal with the "mythos," or intuitive/divine use of symbols. Homer, Thomas Edison, Isadora Duncan, Albert Einstein and George Lucas can all be understood in the context of serving the shamanic function in society - providing useful new patterns for our relationship with each other and the world.

For scientist- and engineer-shaman, the path to gaining shamanic strength is fairly well-defined: both scientists and engineers ground themselves in logic, which is the basic set of rules that governs the physical universe (like 1 apple + 1 apple = 2 apples). People learn logic mostly by solving logical problems, typically using math, syllogisms or computer programming. Every technological innovation in the world is created using a combination of logic and the scientific method, which is really just a systematic way of testing educated guesses to discover if they work or not in reality. But what about us aspiring storyteller-shaman? We typically learn our craft primarily by intuition, starting out by imitating our favorite stories, then slowly venturing into increasingly original territory as we gain a feel for what makes stories entertaining and valuable. But what if we want to draw on more than just intuition, and approach our craft with the same methodic rigour scientists and engineers find so empowering? Where would we begin?

Because he spent his life identifying the root patterns followed by storyteller-shaman, Campbell sometimes referred to himself a "shaman of shaman," which might be abbreviated as "metashaman." Three of the most significant metashaman of the past several hundred years were Max Müller (1823-1900), Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) and Carl Jung (1875-1961). Müller practically invented both comparative linguistics and comparative mythology, providing the first rough "map" of mankind's relationship with divinity and divine symbols which derived from the scientific method applied to several belief systems (before Müller mankind's ideas of the divine were almost always discovered through what might be called "divine intuition" within a single religious tradition). Freud coined the modern use of the word "unconscious," meaning the part of our mind which makes decisions beyond our conscious control; this gave us our first scientific vocabulary for the "territory" inside us where the motifs used by both dreams and mythic stories operate. Jung was the first to organize these motifs into useful categories, such as "shadow" (the embodiment of all our fears) and "anima" (the archetypal feminine). Joseph Campbell extended Jung's idea of the archetype by using them to map the basic pattern of all stories, the monomyth, and also the common element behind all religions and spiritual ideas, which he named the transcendent.

If we aspiring storytellers are one modern form of the tribal shaman, then one way to approach our task is to educate ourselves toward a solid understanding of shamanism and the shamanic role in society. What exactly makes a gifted shaman so valuable to other people? What does it take to become a shaman? The two strongest sources of this "metashamanic" information might be (1) serious anthropological overviews of shamanism and (2) nonfiction essays by the most powerful modern shaman explaining their methods and goals. Both Jung and Campbell were set on the "shamanic path" by asking themselves the same question: "By what myth do I live?" Here are some powerful starting places for asking yourself the same question:
  • Poetics by Aristotle (383-322 BC) might be the oldest "metashamanic" work, an attempt to systematically explain and categorize various forms of fiction. Poetics didn't make a big splash when it was first released, but has since become a classic and staple of literary theory. Aristotle apparently coined the term catharsis, which literally means "to cleanse" but in context refers to the emotional cleansing we experience while vicariously experiencing horrible or forbidden things.

  • "Politics and the English Language" (1946) by George Orwell (1903-1950) is a concentrated burst of mentoring on how to use language with power and honesty.

  • Story: Substance, Structure, Style and The Principles of Screenwriting by Robert McKee is one of the best no-nonsense books describing the basic building blocks and mechanics of stories.

  • Joseph Campbell's The Hero With a Thousand Faces (1949) is short, entertaining, and essential. Campbell is one of the most powerful "metashaman" of all time, and all his books are worth reading. He's even more engaging in video than print, so you might start with his videotapes, particularly The Power of Myth, available at many libraries. Christopher Vogler's The Writer's Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers does more than simplify Campbell's book for screenwriters; he also makes well-reasoned criticisms and suggests improvements to the monomyth pattern.

  • The Portable Jung, edited by Joseph Campbell, is among the best starting places on Jung. Jung himself summarized his ideas for non-psychologists in the book Man and His Symbols (1961). It's important to understand the basics of Freud, but he's terribly long-winded, so you might start with a summary of his main ideas written by someone else. Also helpful is Freud's essay "An Autobiographical Study" (1924), which he wrote towards the end of his life as a summary of his goals, methods and discoveries (available in The Freud Reader).

  • A huge number of books on shamanism are available, but unfortunately most of them tend to be so fluffy, or contain so much wishful thinking and misinformation, that they aren't of much practical use. The two most well-known, exhaustive and helpful meat-and-potatoes anthropological overviews of shamanism are probably The Golden Bough (1922) by Sir James Frazer (1854-1941) and Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy (1964, originally published as Le Chamanisme, 1951) by Mircea Eliade (1907-1986).

  • As I understand the craft of storyteller-shamanism (distinct from metashaman like Jung and Campbell), Tolkien is the most powerful shaman of the past 100+ years. The closest he ever came to explaining what he was up to is his essay "On Fairy-Stories" (1938).

  • The Essential Max Müller; On Language, Mythology, and Religion (2002), edited by Jon R. Stone, may be the best starting place on Müller. While honoring Müller and presenting some of his strongest work, the introduction also acknowledges Müller's flaws and the inevitable partial out-dating of any pioneering work into a new field. Müller is also placed in the correct historical context, helping us understand how revolutionary his idea of "comparative mythology" was when it swept Europe in the late 19th century.

  • King Solomon's Mines (1885) and She (1886), both by H. Rider Haggard (1856-1925), were a powerful direct influence on The Hobbit, Lord of the Rings, Anne Rice's vampire books, Jung's theory of the anima, H.P. Lovecraft (particularly "The Call of Cthulhu," 1926), Edgar Rice Burroughs (John Carter of Mars and Tarzan), Robert E. Howard (Conan) and countless others. These books launched the "lost race" genre, a strong common parent of both science fiction and modern fantasy. Indiana Jones is based primarily on stories which were based primarily on Haggard's Allan Quatermain character. No matter which modern wonder stories or adventure stories you enjoy, they almost certainly have roots tracing back to Haggard.

  • Always be reading. Try spending a minimum of 200% as much time reading as watching TV and films combined. Read at least 50% outside your favorite genres, and at least 30% of your reading should ideally be books from outside your immediate culture (that means books originally written in modern non-English-speaking cultures, books written 100 or more years ago, or both). When a story grips you strongly, make a practice of tracing that story's sources: read interviews with the author, biographies and literate criticism. Try and build an intuitive feel for the creative methods of your favorite artists.

  • Figure out what you love (by trying a lot of things), and become an expert at it. Give special consideration to learning a musical instrument. Poets have been around for longer than recorded history, but up until just a few hundred years ago calling someone a "poet" automatically meant that they knew how to play a musical instrument. Performing musically will give you a feel for what sounds good that will carry over into your writing.

  • An epic is a compression of everything that's worth considering in life strung together into a single narrative. To write an epic, you need to develop your own idea of which things are most important, or worth considering. For instance, you'll probably have birth and death in there. Night and day. War and love. What else? The seasons? Different personality types, or social roles? Good vs. Evil? The afterlife? Look at the world around you - what is it everyone is struggling so hard for? Us shamanic wannabees earn our keep when we identify and communicate better ways for people to fulfill their needs and dreams.

  • Don't limit your sources to other stories: keep an eye out for ideas from music, art, your personal life and especially the natural world which you can import into your stories, expanding our idea of what a story can be. The most powerful shaman are to a degree metashaman, questioning the very nature of stories and consciousness. What is it that draws you to stories in the first place? Who are you? Why are you here?




Here is another place it was mentioned - probably before me and before Kristen Brennan.
reproduction from
http://www.geocities.com/~taoofearth/rants/D21-96.html

Sat. December 21st., 1996, 1:05am

Trendy Techno-Shamans Take the Web

Here I sit, in the “small bedroom” of the apartment that we have turned into the computer room, and I spend endless hours staring at a screen and typing on a keyboard. There is a new trend on television about "web-addiction", and I can see where it might come from, for I think I have it...but not in the sence that most do... I sit here, in Durham, North Carolina, and through this piece of electronic equipment, I can send my consciousness out at any part of the planet, and find information on anything that I could ever imagine. Do shamans not do this to find cures and remedies by sending their consciousness through the astral plane? But now I am not only an observer in this world beyond the physical point of my “computer room”, I can also tell others of my ideas and beliefs by leaving “temporal footprints” in cyber-space and spread the things that I have learned and the things that I believe in...could this be a new state of being...maybe, metashamanism? Being able to be in all places and in no place all at once? The term “Techno-Shaman” has being picked-up by every person that has experience with a computer and a bit of psychedelic drugs, it is no longer a term that fits with those that have been calling themselves this for many years. There are now probably hundreds that claim they came up with the term “techno-shaman”, and they/we all believe in our definitions of the word, they may all be right. But thousands of years ago, who knew the exact definition of a Christian, or a Taoist, or a Buddhist? These are but definitions that society has come up with to lump groups into their social structures, and I have no problem with anyone calling themselves a Techno-Shaman, as long as they always stay open to the goals of Nature and peace, and can allow their thoughts and beliefs to flow from their homes into cyber-space to spread the ideas that there can be a balance between Nature and Technology, and that we must treat both with the respect that they deserve. And if one wishes to become a metashaman, they need to learn to be in all places and in no place all at once. But then again, the word metashaman is something that I just came up with tonight, and by next year, it could be just another buzz word...

Peace and light to all

Tao of Earth



Earlier even than that:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=html&cd=9&url=http%3A%2F%2F209.85.173.132%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dcache%3A5T8vHVbof9gJ%3Awebdelprofesor.ula.ve%2Fhumanidades%2Felicap%2Fes%2Fuploads%2FBiblioteca%2Fmetashammanism.pdf%2Bmetashaman%26hl%3Den%26ct%3Dclnk%26cd%3D9%26gl%3Dus&ei=bmJ-SebmKZGksQPJkoHzAw&usg=AFQjCNHwEa-7PXxbhKmsjg4082141BgkSw&sig2=Twpc-1hV4BCdXxSu225J2g

SCIENCE, SHAMANISM AND METASHAMANISM
Paper Read at the
Second Venezuelan Seminar on Ethnomedicine and Religion
(Mérida, Venezuela, March 26-30, 1990)
Elías Capriles
1.- «Scientific» and Shamanistic Vision
We shall begin by reviewing two main approaches to life, health, illness and healing: the «primitive», shamanistic one prevailing in tribal communities, and the «modern», scientific one prevailing in industrial societies and their followers.
The «scientific» approach characteristic of industrial societies and their followers regards the environment as a cumulus of objects lacking subjectivity to be manipulated, and studies the generation of «physiological disease» overlooking the state of the «patient»s network of significant relationships and the effects that the problems arising in that net could have on the development of «illness».
In general, the «scientific» approach only considers the patient’s significant relationships in the case of imbalances deemed to be «psychological», and only recently—as a result of research such as the one carried out by Bateson, Haley, Weakland and Johnson on the genesis of «schizophrenia» or as the one carried out by Winnicott on the genesis of autism, of the development of the understanding of family dynamics1, and of the development of Antipsychiatry2— has managed to understand part of the social dynamics at the root of such «imbalances».
Whereas the «scientific» approach causes human subjects to relate instrumentally to their environment, the shamanistic approach, which regards the latter as a cumulus of subjective phenomena (or even as a living whole) leads human subjects to relate to it communicatively. In other works I have attempted to show that, in so far as we are possessed by instrumental relations, there is no way for us to confine them to the field of our relationships to the environment and thus we necessarily treat other people as things, and also that, given our technical might, instrumental dealings with the natural environment necessarily result in the destruction of the physical basis of our existence, giving rise to the ecological crisis that threatens us with destruction. Therefore, we must not accept
1Please consult the Bibliography at the end of this article.
2Although the term «Antipsychiatry» was coined by David Cooper (see the Bibliography), Ronald Laing is also considered as an antipsychiatrist, and the same may be said of Aaron Esterson, Lee, Philipson, Berke, Szchazman and other members of Laing’s original group. The precedents of Antipsychiatry are to be found in the Jungian interpretation of neurosis as a potentially healing process, in Kazimierz Dabrowski’s book Positive Disintegration and in the research by Gregory Bateson (in particular, in various of the works in the book Steps to an Ecology of Mind and in the book Perceval’s Narrative). According to Antipsychiatry, psychosis may be a spontaneous self-healing process that, unless institutionally aborted, may put an end to alienated, pathological normality (that is, of the pathological result of adaptation to a sick society).

Habermas’ thesis that the relations between human beings should be communicative and that the relations between human beings and their environment should be instrumental3.
Now, what we are concerned with here is that the shamanistic approach searches for the root of imbalances or illness in a pathology of the intersubjective relationships of the «diseased» person. Among the sharanahua, the cashinahua and the members of other South American tribes, the shaman consumes a psychedelic substance in order to discover and treat the communicative pathology that supposedly produced the imbalance4. As noted by Marlene Dobkin de Ríos5:
«The use of ayahuasca for healing does not require the conceptualization of the hallucinogenic as a healing agent per se. Rather, the vine is regarded as a substance that activates a powerful means for achieving an intended result: it gives the healer access to the culturally important zone of the causality of illness, allowing him or her to identify the nature of the illness... in order to later on neutralize or drive away the magic ill that is regarded as the cause of the disease. In regard to the successes attributed to the healer, we find that in general terms there has been a process of selection whereby the healers only accept the patients whom they believe they may successfully treat... Only the patients suffering given kinds of illness take ayahuasca—normally those suffering ills often classified as psychosomatic.»
We should not think that shamans only treat maladies imaginaires. Recent research has dug out the psychological roots of many illness that until very recently were regarded by the prevailing «medical science» as physiological diseases having no connection to the psyche—and in particular of illness still deemed «incurable» or difficult to cure, such as cancer6.
3See Elías Capriles, Las aventuras del fabuloso hombre-máquina. Contra Habermas y la ratio technica.
4See Michael J. Harner, Alucinógenos y chamanismo.
5Marlene Dobkin de Ríos (Spanish, 1976), Curas con ayahuasca en un barrio bajo urbano. In Michael J. Harner, opere citato.
6As noted by Fritjof Capra in his book The Turning Point:

«The Simontons fully recognize the role or carcinogenic substances and environmental influences in the formation of cancer cells, and they strongly advocate the implementation of appropriate social policies to eliminate these health hazards. However, they have also come to realize that neither carcinogenic substances, nor radiation, nor genetic predisposition alone will provide an adequate explanation of what causes cancer. No understanding of cancer will be complete without addressing the crucial question: What inhibits a person’s immune system, at a particular time, from recognizing and destroying abnormal cells and thus allows them to grow into a life-threatening tumor? This is the question on which the Simontons have concentrated in their research and therapeutic practice, and they have found that it can be answered only by carefully considering the mental end emotional aspects of health and illness.
«The emerging picture of cancer is consistent with the general model of illness we have been developing. A state of imbalance is generated by prolonged stress which is channeled through a particular personality configuration to give rise to specific disorders. In cancer the crucial stresses appear to be those that threaten some role or relationship that is central to the person’s identity, or set up a situation from which there is apparently no escapea. Several studies suggest that these critical stresses typically occur six to eighteen months before the diagnosis of cancerb. They are likely to generate feelings of despair, helplessness, and hopelessness. Because of these feelings, serious illness, and even death, may become consciously or unconsciouslyc acceptable as a potential solution.
«The Simontons and other researchers have developed a psychosomatic model of cancer that shows how psychological and physical states work together in the onset of the disease. Although many details of this process still need to be clarified, it has become clear that the emotional stress has two principal effects. It suppresses the body’s immune system and, at the same time, leads to hormonal imbalances that result in an increased production of abnormal cells. Thus optimal conditions for cancer growth are created. The production of malignant cells is enhanced precisely at a time when the body is least capable of destroying them...
In ancient Tibet, shamanistic and metashamanistic Bönpo medicine asserted that in order to heal the patient it was necessary to heal the environment, for it was believed that many illness were caused by the subjective entities who animate—or who live in—natural phenomena, as the result of a provocation in which the diseased person or other human beings (often intimately related to the diseased) had incurred7.
In regard to «mental illness», the shamanistic approach is, also, radically different from the «scientific» one. States that modern science deems «pathological» and which it tries to «heal» by means of countless inefficacious and destructive treatments were intentionally induced by the shaman as means of initiation to a sacred reality, capable of leading the individual to a state of greater personal realization and communicative integration.
In fact, in the last three decades a series of students of the human mind have insisted that certain psychotic episodes could be spontaneous self-healing processes that are aborted by the environment in the family, the asylum and other institutions, and transformed into processes of self-destruction, of which the former also contain an element8. As noted by
«...Lawrence LeShan studied more than five hundred cancer patients and identified the following significant components in their life historiesd: feelings of isolation, neglect, and despair during youth, with intense interpersonal relationships appearing difficult or dangerous; a strong relationship with a person or great satisfaction with a role in early adulthood, which becomes the center of the individual’s life; loss of the relationship or role, resulting in despair; internalizing of the despair to the extent that individuals are unable to let other people know when they feel hurt, angry, or hostile. This basic pattern has been confirmed as typical of cancer patients by a number of researchers.
«The basic philosophy of the Simonton approach affirms that the development of cancer involves a number of interdependent psychological and biological processes, that these processes can be recognized and understood, and that the sequence of events that leads to illness can be reversed to lead the organism back into a healthy state. As in any holistic therapy, the first step toward initiating the healing cycle consists of making patients aware of the wider context of their illness. Establishing the context of cancer begins by by asking patients to identify the major stresses occurring in their lives six to eighteen months prior to their diagnosis. The list of these stresses is then used as a basis for discussing the patients’ participation in the onset of their disease. The purpose of the concept of patient participation is not to evoke guilt, but rather to create the basis for reversing the cycle of psychosomatic processes that led to the state of ill health.»
___________________________________________________________________
a) For example, situations such as those that Ronald Laing called «untenable», defined as those in which we cannot stay and, however, we cannot leave.
b) See Simonton, Mathews-Simonton y Creighton, Getting Well Again, p. 57 et seq.
c) Personally, I cannot accept the hypothesis of the «unconscious», unless it be understood as the result of that which Sartre called «bad faith». Therefore, I cannot accept this distinction between «consciously acceptable» e «unconsciously acceptable». Nonetheless, I agree that insisting that the illness is the result of a conscious decision that is then concealed could produce a feeling of guilt that in turn could aggravate the illness or difficult healing.
d) See Lawrence LeShan (1977), You Can Fight for Your Life, p. 49 et seq.
___________________________________________________________________________
7See the work by John Meredith Reynolds quoted in the Bibliography and the various works by Namkhai Norbu Rinpoche, as well as the transcriptions of his talks.
8In Perceval’s Narrative, Gregory Bateson wrote about «schizophrenic» psychosis:
«It would appear that once precipitated into psychosis the patient has a course to run. He is, as it were, embarked upon a voyage of discovery which is only completed by his return to the normal world, to which he comes back with insights different from those of the inhabitants who never embarked on such a voyage. Once begun, a schizophrenic episode would appear to have as definite a course as an initiation ceremony—a death and a rebirth—into which the novice may have been precipitated by his family life or by adventitious circumstances, but which in its course is largely steered by endogenous process.

«In terms of this picture, spontaneous remission is no problem. This is only the final and natural outcome of the total process. What needs to be explained is the failure of many who embark upon this voyage
Michel Foucault, in the European «Classical Age» madness was often thought to have a divine character; it has been rather recently that Europeans have begun to regard all kinds of madness as diseases to be «healed» by re-establishing normality9.
In any case, there is no doubt that the shamanistic vision is ecologically healthier than the «scientific» vision, for by leading human beings to relate communicatively to their natural environment, the latter is protected and preserved10. The instrumental attitude
to return from it. Do these encounter circumstances either in family life or in institutional care so grossly maladaptive that even the richest and best organized hallucinatory experience cannot save them?
In turn, in The Politics of Experience Ronald Laing wrote:
«There is a great deal that urgently needs to be written about this and similar experiences. But I am going to confine myself to a few matters of fundamental orientation.
«We can no longer assume that such a voyage is an illness that has to be treated. Yet the padded cell is now outdated by the «improved» methods of treatment now in use.
«If we can demystify ourselves, we see «treatment» (electro-shocks, tranquilizers, deep-freezing—some times even psychoanalysis) as ways of stopping this sequence from occurring.
«Can we not see that this voyage is not what we need to be cured of, but that it is itself a natural way of healing our own appalling state of alienation called normality?
«In other times people intentionally embarked upon this voyage.
«Or if they found themselves already embarked, willy-nilly, they gave thanks, as for a special grace.»
And also:
«From the alienated starting point of our pseudo-sanity, everything is equivocal. Our sanity is not «true» sanity. Their madness is not «true» madness. The madness of our patients is an artefact of the destruction wreaked on them by us, and by them on themselves. Let no one suppose that we meet «true» madness any more than we are truly sane. The madness that we encounter in «patients» is a gross travesty, a mockery, a grotesque caricature of what the natural healing of that stranged integration we call sanity may be. True sanity entails in one way or another the dissolution of the normal ego, that false self competently adjusted to our alienated social reality: the emergence of the «inner» archetypical mediators of divine power, and through this death a rebirth, and the eventual re-establishment of a new kind of ego-functioning, the ego now being the servant of the divine, no longer its betrayer.»
9See Michel Foucault, Histoire de la folie à l’age classique.
10American Indians, like pre-Buddhist Tibetans and the aboriginals of many regions, were still in the communicative stage and therefore related to natural phenomena as though these were persons rather than mere things lacking subjectivity: all of their relations were communicative. And, as shown by the prophetic statements of several Indian sages (among which it is best known the answer of chief Seattle to the proposal of the U. S. President to buy the lands of his tribe), having been in contact with the Anglo-saxon invaders and perceived the latter’s attitude toward Nature, North American Indians predicted the ecological crisis that currently threatens us with destruction.
In general, American Indians were masters in the art of ecological conservation. As noted by Arturo Eichler in his book S.O.S. Planeta Tierraa:

«The ancient Lacandones of Mexico used to grow 70 different products in a single hectare and, even today, those Amazonian aborigines... who have not yet been exterminated... grow up to 80 varied products in their small chacras, which they never over-exploited, so that after millennia they have not degraded their natural environment. They know that many «undesirable» weeds are indicators reflecting the quality of the soil or some specific lack. When the balance of the soil is restored, the weed disappears on its own.»
A group of anthropologists that in Peru restored a pre-Columbian system of irrigation channels that also works as natural fertilizer and used it for growing crops obtained with its help, and without chemical fertilizers, a much higher productivity per hectare than the average productivity achieved elsewhere with the help of chemical fertilizers. In the same way, as Dr. Eichler notes in the above-mentioned booka:
«Already in the thirteenth century Marco Polo observed that Asian peasants used to leave aside small lots sown with grain for insect-eating birds, and he was astonished when he observed that the birds... used to
toward the natural environment that characterizes the «scientific» vision, instead, has produced an ecological crisis that threatens to cause our extinction before the first half of the next century, or even during the last decade of the present one.
In the same way, the shamanistic approach to illness and «delirium», and the shamanistic treatment of imbalances, is no doubt less dangerous and harmful—and, in many cases, more effective—than that of the prevailing «medical science».
2.- A Third Approach, Different from the «Scientific» and the «Shamanistic»: the Metashamanistic, Liberating and Genuinely Religious11
As noted by Michael J. Harner, South American shamans think that the «reality» to which the hallucinogenic substance gives them access is the «true reality», and that the every day vision free of the effect of drugs is a «false reality». Available information about shamanistic cultures of other regions suggests that Harner’s statement about South American shamanism may apply to shamanism in general: although different shamanistic cultures may attribute a greater or lesser reality to the every day vision of the «normal» individual, all shamanistic cultures attribute a high degree of reality—in general higher than that of the «every day reality»—to the shamanistic experiences induced with the help of psychedelics or by other means12.
learn (to eat only that which had been destined to them). Today, whichever species competes with us for food is our deadly enemy.»
Possessed to such an extent by instrumental relations and by the lack of systemic wisdom that Buddhists call avidya, modern Westerners only know how to destroy the world with the technological tools that they developed for that purpose. Thus, the transformation of the human psyche that would allow us to survive and that would give rise to a new Golden Age must, on the one hand, put an end to instrumental primary process relations and, on the other hand, provide us with a wider range of vision free of conceptual overvaluation that will not set us in opposition to Nature and other human beings.
____________________________________________________________
a) Arturo Eichler, work mentioned in the Bibliography.
____________________________________________________________
11The word «religious» comes from the Latin religare, meaning «to re-establish the link»: religion is the re-establishment of the link with the divinity or, in other words, with Unity, Wholeness, Plenitude, Perfection, etc. Now, in so far as we feel separate of that which religions call «divinity», any link we may establish with it will necessarily break sooner or later. This is why, far more «religious» than the temporary re-establishment of a link with something that we consider external to ourselves is the discovery of our primordial nature, which is precisely that which theistic religions understand as an «external divinity» and that constitutes the true nature of all appearances and of the whole universe.
Furthermore, leaving aside etymological considerations, in the life-histories of most founders of those religions that we call «great» we find stories telling us how they had experiences of the «supernatural reality» in which shamans work, and were Enlightened precisely because they recognize them as illusory and managed to avoid its enchantment. Shakyamuni, the historical Buddha, was first attacked with arrows and other weapons by Mara (the demon) and his retinue and then was object to the seduction of the Apsaras (Mara’s daughters), yet remained undisturbed and thus attained Enlightenment. Jesus was tempted in the desert, yet did not succumb to the false appearances and thus achieved his spiritual majesty. Milarepa was attacked by the goddess Tseringma and a retinue of demons; having given up the protection of self and recognized that all experiencia is illusory, he attained Enlightenment. An so on and on.
12See the works mentioned in the Bibliography; in particular, those by Mircea Eliade, that by Gary Doore (Ed.) and that by Ronny Velásquez.

In Tibet and its zone of cultural influence, popular culture contains important shamanistic elements13, which the representatives of the two most important religious systems do not discourage. Both Bönpo and Buddhist Lamas refer to local spirits and demons as self-existent entities that may cause great harm and, in general, encourage the belief in supernatural entities that may be noxious or helpful to human beings. Nonetheless, to gifted disciples who wish to attain liberation from error and delusion, obtaining that which both Buddhists and Bönpos call «Enlightenment», Lamas of both systems teach very dangerous practices that may eventually allow them to recognize the «supernatural» reality as illusory and free themselves from its influence and power. Repetition of the practice progressively neutralizes the propensity to experience the «supernatural» reality to which the practitioner gains access by yogic-shamanistic means as something self-existent, independent of the practitioner’s mental processes, and absolutely true.
The point is that Tibetan spiritual systems regard as delusive, both the every day experience of human beings and the «supernatural» experience to which practitioners gain access by yogic and shamanistic means. This is not to say that both realms of experience are considered to be merely hallucinatory. Tibetan Teachings acknowledge that there is a given that, upon being processed by our mental processes, is experienced as the world in which we live, with its countless entities. Delusion arises when we are unable to see that entities do not have inherent, absolute existence, but depend both on the existence of other entities and on the functioning of our mental process in order to exist in the way they exist for us. Thus, delusion is a confusion about the mode of existence of entities, including the human subject: when we believe that ourselves and other entities exist inherently and substantially (in the sense of being self-existent and not needing anything other to itself in order to exist), that the relative is absolute, we are under delusion.
Delusion produces countless emotional responses that generate constant dissatisfaction and recurring frustration and suffering. If we believe in the supposedly inherent existence of «supernatural reality», we may become victims of demons and spirits, just as has happened to so many Tibetans; if we believe in the supposedly inherent existence of the entities, values and beliefs of every day reality, we will struggle in order to maintain our identities, possessions, etc., and thus will give rise to constant discomfort and dissatisfaction as well as to recurring frustration and pain.
However, by simply telling ourselves that the «supernatural» reality does not exist in truth, we would change nothing: the propensities to experience it and become its victims would still be there and, besides, we would continues to experience the everyday reality as self-existent. This is why it is necessary to do the practice in which, beginning from shamanistic belief, we experience the «supernatural» reality with its demons and spirits and, while we experience that «reality», we apply the instructions received from the Teacher or Lama in order to recognize it as illusory and free ourselves from its influence and power.
13Modern anthropologists would say that it has «conserved» shamanistic elements, and would imagine that the metashamanistic approach developed out of shamanism. This is precisely the opposite of what Idries Shah asserts in his book The Sufis: according to Shah, shamanism is a degeneration of metashamanism. This thesis fits into the Indian-Greek-Roman schema of processes of temporality—aeons or kalpa—that are divided into eras of increasing degeneration. The reader may find a description of the some versions of this schema as well as a critique of Hegel’s opposite schema in my book Mind-Society-Ecosystem: Transformation for Survival, in a forthcoming book I have written with Mayda Hocevar and three other post-graduate students of philosophy, and also in my paper Wisdom, Equity and Peace and in my book Qué somos y adónde vamos.
If we are successful in this and we repeat the practice again and again, also in daily life we shall recognize to an ever greater extent the delusive character of our projections and therefore we shall experience ever increasing plenitude and ever decreasing dissatisfaction, frustration and suffering.

3.- Illness, Tibetan Ethnomedicine and the Practice of gCod.
Among the means applied by Tibetans in order to achieve the above, the famous practice of gcod is of the greatest importance.
According to the Bönpo ethnomedicine of ancient Tibet, many illness were the result of the revenge of spirits, demons and other «supernatural» entities who had been harmed by the plowing of the soil, the building of dams, the construction of houses, etc., by the harmed individual, by members of her or his family and/or by other human beings. Ancient Bönpo medicine attempted to cure the disease by healing the natural environment, on the premises that, if the dwelling and environment of the «supernatural» entities were healed and therefore the entities themselves would heal, they would cease taking revenge by inflicting illness on those responsible and on other human beings14.
In the practice of gcod, the practitioner starts from the basis of the belief in demons, spirits and other supposedly objective entities who inflict illness on human beings, bringing to bear the principle of ancient Bönpo medicine that requires that the natural environment be healed if human beings are to be healed. Nonetheless, instead of encouraging the practitioner to protect her or himself from demons and spirits regarded as «objective» in order to forestall harm, she or he is told to face them, because they are her or his own overvalued thoughts which she or he must recognize as such and liberate. Yet it is not enough to know intellectually that demons and spirits are only overvalued thoughts; the practitioner must carry out the practice spending the nights of waning moon in the charnel grounds where Tibetans dismember the corpses of their dead and offer them to the wild beasts15, for it is widely believed that such places are inhabited by most noxious «supernatural» beings and that whoever spends the night in them will meet the most horrible death one can imagine.
During the practice, by yogic-shamanistic means the yogi must gain access to the dangerous «supernatural» reality that is proper to the charnel ground and that, according to popular belief, is bound to destroy her or him. Then, faced with dreadful demons and other noxious beings, she or he must realize that these are but projections of her or his own mind and thus apply the instructions that will lead to the spontaneous dissolution of the tensions at the root of the illusion of inherent existence and of the dread begotten by that illusion, and thus to the realization of Truth, understood as the dissolution of delusion and error: the realization of the unreality of the visions that appear in the practice and of all experiences—those of daily life and those of the «supernatural» realm.
14See Note 7.
15In this way, human corpses can be more directly and immediately useful to other sentient beings than they would be if they were buried or cremated. Moreover, this custom may serve as a medicine against the illness of wanting to keep and protect one’s own body, even beyond one’s death.

Some practitioners who, during the practice, have failed to attain liberation from delusion, have met death, being «devoured» by the «supernatural», noxious beings inhabiting the charnel ground. One could ask how can the beings of the practitioner’s imagination kill her or him. There is the story of a practitioner of gcod who had a knife with him while doing the practice; upon being assailed by demons and other noxious beings, panic overtook him, and he took out his knife in order to defend himself. Fortunately, when he was about to stick the knife into the demon’s belly, a flash of clarity caused him to check and see where was he going to stick it—upon which he realized that he directed it to his own belly. Had he stuck the knife, he would have died and his corpse would have found half-devoured or fully devoured by the beasts who feed on corpses.
The practitioner must offer her or his body to the demons, visualizing it as an ambrosia that gives access to wisdom and liberation16 and thus causes the beings who eat it to cease suffering and to stop inflicting suffering to other beings. This will induce a dreadful «supernatural» experience in which the noxious beings devour her or him. If her or his practice is effective, she or he will recognize the illusory character of the experience, and the psychophysical tensions at its root will spontaneously dissolve, putting an end to fear and forestalling harm.
Repetition of the experience will cause the practitioner to become immune to the influence of illness-inflicting demons, which results in a most «real» immunity to infectious diseases—so «real» that, during epidemics, the experienced practitioners of gcod were in charge of disposing of the corpses and dismembering them to feed the beasts, but none of those who were in such an intimate contact with the illness would contract it: the practitioners of gcod who had obtained the result of the practice had become immune to all infectious diseases17. Furthermore, in many cases lepers and other people suffering illness then deemed «incurable» set out to practice gcod as a preparation to face death and, as a result, were «miraculously» cured and, moreover, became immune to all infections18.
Tibetans also believe that the realized practitioners of gcod have the ability to cure the diseases of others when they are caused by demons and other «supernatural» entities. In fact, practitioners of gcod often perform the gcod ritual for the ill and, although many Lamas insist that those rituals are mere superstition, in most cases the diseased person heals as a result of the ritual.
Of course, Tibetans only resort to such rituals when remission cannot be achieved by other means and it is suspected that the cause of the illness is the provocation of noxious «supernatural» beings. In other occasions, Tibetan doctors prescribe: (1) pills made with different vegetable products, (2) products that often contain such chemicals as mercury, sulfur and gold, and even gems; (3) cauterization, and (4) acupuncture. I have with me different kinds of Tibetan pills that I can show to those interested.
In the case of that which Tibetans call «energy disturbances» and which we call «mental illness», Tibetan doctors also prescribe various medicines featuring different vegetable products. However, according to Tibetan medicine, such disturbances are often the result of the provocations of «supernatural» beings, and therefore it is common to ask the practitioners of gcod to perform the therapeutic ritual. Again, in many cases, this results in the remission of the disturbance.
16Sanskrit: amrta; Tibetan: bdud-rtsi (dütsi).
17See Giuseppe Tucci, work mentioned in the Bibliography.
18Ibidem. See also the various works in which Alexandra David-Neel recounts her experiences in Tibet.

Nevertheless, both Tibetan Buddhists and Bönpos insist that the only true mental illness is delusion and the passions associated to it: delusion and the passions are called nyon-mongs (nyonmong), whereas crazy people are called nyon-pa (nyonpa), which means «the one who is under the power of the nyon-mongs». Therefore, both Buddhist and Bönpos affirm that the mind is truly healed only when the individual is freed from delusion. For example, when she or he has successfully completed the practice of gcod and the subsequent practices of thod-rgal (togel) and/or of the yang-thik (yangthik).
Besides—preferably before undertaking the practice of gcod—the yogi or yogini must practise for some time a set of other disciplines, among which I will refer to the practice of dreams. If delusion consists in being confused in regard to the mode of existence of reality, when we dream and believe that our dream is part of the «real life» of wakefulness, unaware that it is only a dream, we are also under delusion. Therefore, the practice of dream is deemed very important. In it, we must recognize the dream as such and yet keep dreaming19 and direct the dream according to the traditional instructions provided by the Teacher20. Among these, I want to mention the following: (1) to jump into abysses, into the fangs of wild beasts, into torrents and, in general, to face situations that in the «real life» of wakefulness would destroy our body, in order to taste the inseparability of insubstantiality and pleasure when the «body of dream» is not destroyed as a «real body» would be during wakefulness; (2) to practise the «alchemy of transformation», transforming our own body into water in order to put off fires, into fire in order to burn wood, and so on; (3) to transform demons and other noxious entities appearing in our dreams into tutelar deities21 such as those that are visualized in the practices of bskyed-rim (kyerim) and rdzogs-rim (dzogrim), etc. In order to carry out these practices successfully, the Teachings prescribe other practices to be performed during wakefulness, such as that of the «illusory body»22 and that of imagining that the experiences of wakefulness are sequences of a dream23. In the same way, although celibacy is not recommended, the practitioner must keep the precepts of anuyogatantra that forbid the emission of sexual fluids24. Success in recognizing dreams as such and in carrying out the various activities prescribed will prepare the practitioner to succeed in the practice of gcod and forestall the potential harm of failing to recognize the «supernatural» experience as illusory and thus failing to dissolve the tensions at the root of the illusory experience and of the dread it begets.
4.- Conclusion
Although the vision of shamanism is less harmful than that of modern «science», it is still a vision that imprisons and enslaves human beings. The aim of Tibetan methods is to
19Both Descartes and Sartre (see Bibliography) claimed that this was impossible. As the experience of any practitioner of this yoga proves, they were both totally wrong in this respect.
20See Namkhai Norbu, Dreamwork. Also, see Elías Capriles, Autoliberación de los seis bardo o «modos de experiencia».
21In Sanskrit, devata; in Tibetan, yi-dam (yidam).
22Practice performed with a mirror, with one’s own echo, etc. See Herbert V. Guenther, work mentioned in the Bibliography, and Elías Capriles, Auto-liberación de los seis bardo o «modos de experiencia» .
23See Elías Capriles (1986), Autoliberación de los seis bardo o «modos de experiencia».
24See Elías Capriles: (1) The Direct Path. Providing a Background for Approaching the Practice of rDzogs-chen. (2) Introducción a la teoría y práctica del budismo tántrico. (3) Qué somos y adónde vamos.

allow individuals to achieve liberation in regard to all possible visions: to the daily, everyday vision—whether «scientific» or «tribal»—and to the «supernatural» vision proper to shamanism. Upon attaining that liberation, the individual obtains a complete mastery of the «supernatural forces» that affect human beings, precisely because the sensation that the «I» as a separate entity is mastering something different from and external to itself has dissolved.
Thus, Tibetan systems are not normal shamanistic systems, but metashamanistic ones: systems that employ the principles of shamanism in order to free the individual, not only of the supernatural beliefs that enslave her or him, but also of the belief in self-existence of everyday reality that causes him to face constant dissatisfaction and recurring suffering.
Although in the West some traditions and isolated individuals are aware that the supreme aim of yogic and shamanistic tools is the liberation of all experiences rather than the mere production of extraordinary ones, and some have even attained to the self-liberation of experience, in general most members of Western civilization who have experimented with different means of access to the «supernatural reality» proper of shamanism—including most psychologists and psychiatrists who have done so—have contented themselves to induce extraordinary experiences, without knowing how—and in general without even trying—to liberate those experiences. Thus, the bulk of Westerners has had no access to genuine metashamanistic systems25.
25It was due to the lack of direct metashamanistic instruction and transmission, and to the influence of shamanistic and protoshamanistic ideologists such as Timothy Leary, that the hippy movement fell apart, that many of its members were «psychiatrycized», that many others destroyed themselves through hard drugs or adapted to the system and, leaving aside their spiritual search, set out to achieve a high position in that system, and that still others enslaved themselves with the help of false spiritual masters and systems.

The mistake of hippies was to have given themselves to the induction of «altered states» unaware that these states were experiences conditioned by delusion to which it was a major mistake to cling and that it was necessary to interrupt and liberate, not knowing the methods for interrupting and liberating them and lacking the capacity to apply them. Thus, they clung to the experiences of greater space-time-knowledgea and the pleasure resulting from the increase in the bioenergetic inputb induced by the substances in question, and came to depend on those substances in order to obtain extraordinary experiences—which, as we have seen, in general were conditioned and delusive and did not represent a true liberation.
Therefore, sooner or later many of the seekers of «altered states» had to face the «bad trip» or «psychotomimetic experience» that may obtain after the widening and permeabilization of the focus of conscious attention. This widening and permeabilization—produced by the effect of psychedelic substances, by kundalini yoga and by other spiritual practices—may allow «ego-asyntonic» contents to slip into the consciousness, which in turn may face the individual with a tremendous conflict. It may also reveal the insubstantiality of the «I» and of all that we consider substantial, producing enormous anguish in those who have been conditioned to dread insubstantiality and «nothingness» and to flee from that dread by clinging to the «I» and to the illusion of substantiality. In the same way, if during the state produced by the increase of bioenergetic input passions based on aversion happen to manifest, the high bioenergetic input and the widening and permeabilization of consciousness may cause us to experience them as a veritable hell.
No matter how anguish and tensions arise, the high bioenergetic input will not allow the individual to remain unaware of them by means of the phenomenological double negation or «bad faith»c: the limits of conscious attention have become wider and more permeable, no longer allowing the individual to keep unaware of whatever she or he does not want to see. And, since the individual reacts to an increased suffering with increased rejection, the anguish becomes a veritable hell which—in case the individual does not manage to act on her or his experience so that it will cease contradicting his self-image and false sense of substantiality—may last far beyond the normal effect of the drug, becoming «psychosis».
This is not to say that metashamanism has only been easily accessible in Central Asia and, to a lesser degree, in the rest of the East. We cannot discard the possibility that some nations of pre-Hispanic America may have had wide and easy access to metashamanistic systems. If it were proved that they are not mere fiction, the works by Carlos Castañeda would show, at least, that some systems of aboriginal America contain elements of the kind that I have called «liberating» or «metashamanistic».
If the individual is unprepared, she or he will not manage to descend, like Dante, to the bottom of Hell, in order to enter Purgatory and, going through it, reach the Open Spaced of liberation. Instead, she or he will take the descent to Hell as a dead end and will try by all means to return to the Limbo of «normality». However, unable to manage, she or he will remain in a state of despair, with her or his ego-function and capacity to socialize impaired.
During the sixties, many of those who faced the above problem recurred to the consumption of cocaine, to false spiritual systems and teachers, to heroine and to other means of inflating their deflates egos and/or recover their capacity to socialize. In particular, many of those who became habituated to cocaine integrated themselves into the system and set out to work hard in it in order to afford the costly habit, helping the system to temporarily prosper. Heroine addicts, instead, «gave themselves up to death»: whereas cocaine may produce a false «heroism of victory», heroine may produce a false «heroism of defeat».
____________________________________________________________
a) When our focus of conscious attention widens, our spatial perspective widens and our subjective sensation of temporality slows down. The focus of attention widens to the extent that the bioenergetic input increases. For an explanation of the concept of space-time-knowledge see Tarthang Tulku, work mentioned in the Bibliography.
b) In Sanskrit, kundalini; in Tibetan, thig-le (tigley). Western science explains in terms of the concept of «alterations of brain biochemistry» the alterations that ancient Eastern traditions explain in terms of the concept of «increase of bioenergetic input». Both explanations are partly valid and must be taken into account.
c) I.e., self-deceit. See J. P. Sartre, Being and Nothingness. In several of my works I have explained how the Freudian hypothesis of the unconscious and the Sartrean theory of «bad faith».
d) In Tibetan, nam-’’mkha (namk’a), meaning «space», «sky» or «heavens» (the latter, not in the sense of the conditioned state of temporary, illusory happiness that Buddhism calls deva loka or deva gati).
BIBLIOGRAFY
1.- Shamanism, Tribal and Eastern Cultures, Anthropology, History of Shamanistic Catalysts
Baker, Richard (1986), Oriental Thought—The Japanese Perspective. Washington, D. C., ReVISION magazine, Vol. 9, Nº 1, summer/fall 1986.
Bateson, Gregory (recopilación 1979), Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York, Ballantine; London, Paladin.
Bateson, Gregory, Bali: The Value System of a Steady State. In Bateson, opere citato.
Brau, Jean-Louis (1968; Spanish 1974), Historia de las drogas. Barcelona, Bruguera.
Castañeda, Carlos, The Teachings of Don Juan.
Castañeda, Carlos, A Separate Reality.
Castañeda, Carlos, Journey to Ixlan.
Castañeda, Carlos, Tales of Power.
Castañeda, Carlos, The Second Ring of Power.
Castañeda, Carlos, The Gift of the Eagle.
Castañeda, Carlos, The Internal Fire.
Castañeda, Carlos, The Silent Knowledge.
Cauvin, Jacques (1987), L’ apparition des premières divinités. In La Recherche , N° 195, December 1987.
Dobkin de Ríos, Marlene, Curas con ayahuasca en un barrio bajo urbano. In Harner, M. I. opere citato.
Donner, Florinda, Shabono.
Doore, Gary (Ed.), The Shaman’s Path. Healing, Personal Growth and Empowerment. Boulder and London, Shambhala Publications.
Eichler, Arturo (1987), S.O.S. Planeta Tierra. Caracas, Guardia Nacional de Venezuela.
Eliade, Mircea, Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy. New York, Harper & Row.
Eliade, Mircea, Myths, Dreams and Mysteries. New York, Harper & Row.
Eliade, Mircea, Myth and Reality. New York, Harper & Row.
Eliade, Mircea (1951; Spanish 1962; Alianza 1972), El mito del eterno retorno. Arquetipos y repetición. Madrid, Alianza Editorial, El libro de bolsillo.
Eliade, Mircea (1957; Spanish 1967), Lo sagrado y lo profano. Barcelona, Editorial Labor.
Eliade, Mircea, Mito y realidad. Barcelona, Guadarrama, Colección Punto Omega.
Gunn Allen, Paula (1986), Tribal Cultures. Washington, D. C., ReVISION magazine, Vol. 9, Nº 1, summer/fall 1986.
Harner, Michael J. (Spanish, 1973), Alucinógenos y chamanismo. Madrid, Editorial Labor. In English, Hallucinogens and Shammanism. London, Oxford University Press.
Heim, Roger (1963), Les champignons toxiques et hallucinogènes. Paris, Éditions N. Boubée & Cie.
Heim, Roger (1959), Les investigations anciennes et récentes propres aux Agarics hallucinogènes du Mexique, à leur action et aux substances qui en sont responsables. Paris, Masson.
Heim, Roger and R. Gordon Wasson (1958/9), Les Champignons hallucinogènes du Mexique. Paris, Archives du Muséum National d’Histoire naturelle.
Huxley, Aldous (1953), The Doors of Perception. London, Chatto & Windus.
Huxley, Aldous (1956), Heaven & Hell. London, Chatto & Windus.
Kissinger, Kenneth M. El uso del «Banisteriopsis» entre los cashinahua del Perú. In Harner, M. I. opere citato.
Leary, Thimoty, High Priest. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Leary, Timothy, The Politics of Ecstasy.
Lommel, Andreas, El arte prehistórico y primitivo (El mundo del Arte—Las artes plásticas de sus orígenes a la actualidad, Vol. I. Aggs Industrias Gráficas S.A., Brasil).
Norberg-Hodge, Helena (1986), Experiences in Ladakh. Washington, D. C., ReVISION magazine, Vol. 9, Nº 1, verano/otoño de 1986.
Reynolds, John Meredith (1988; publisht in 1989), The Nagas—Ancient Bönpo Teaching and the Nagas. In Rivista Meri Gar/Meri Gar Review, Arcidosso, Grosseto, Italia.
Seattle, Indian Chief, Letter to the President of the USA.
Siskind, Janet, Visiones y curas entre los sharanahua. In Harner, M. I. opere citato.
Velásquez, Ronny (1987), Chamanismo, mito y religión en cuatro naciones étnicas de América aborigen. Caracas, Academia Nacional de la Historia.
Wasson, R. Gordon (1962), The Hallucinogenic mushrooms of Mexico and Psilocybin: a bibliography. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Watts, Alan W., The Joyous Cosmology. New York, Pantheon.
2.- Madness as a Healing Process, Antipsychiatry, Psychedelic Therapy
Bateson, Gregory (recopilación 1979), Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York, Ballantine; London, Paladin.
Bateson, Gregory, Perceval’s Narrative. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Berke, Joseph and Mary Barnes, Two Accounts of a Journey Through Madness. Harmondsworth, Pelican.
Cooper, David, Psychiatry and Antipsychiatry .
Cooper, David, The Death of the Family. Hardmonsworth, Pelican.
Cooper, David, The Grammar of Life. Hardmonsworth, Pelican.
Dabrowski, Kazimierz (1964), Positive Disintegration. London, Little Brown & Co.
Dabrowski, Kazimierz (1964), Personality Shaping Through Positive Disintegration. London, Little Brown & Co.
Dabrowski, Kazimierz, con A. Kawczak and M. M. Piechowski (1964), Mental Growth Through Positive Disintegration. London, Gryf Publications.
Dabrowski, Kazimierz (1972; Spanish 1980), La psiconeurosis no es una enfermedad. Lima, Ediciones Unife.
Dante Alighieri (this edition, 1979/83), La divina commedia. Milan, Ulrico Hoepli.
Esterson, Aaron, The Leaves of Spring. Hardmonsworth, Pelican.
Foucault, Michel (French, 1964/1972; Spanish 1967/1986), Historia de la locura en la época clásica (2 volumes). México, Fondo de Cultura Económica (Breviarios).
Freud, Sigmund (1895; published individually in Spanish: 1974), Proyecto de una psicología para neurólogos. Madrid, Alianza Editorial (Libro de Bolsillo). English: Project for a Scientific Psychology. This work should not be classified here, except in so far as it is essential to Bateson’s theories.
Grof, Stanislav (1976), Realms of the Human Unconscious. New York, Dutton.
Grof, Stanislav (1980), LSD Psychotherapy. Pomona, Calif., Hunter House.
Grof, Stanislav, Journeys Beyond the Brain.
Grof, Stanislav (1986), Psychology and Consciousness Research. Washington, D. C., ReVISION magazine, Vol. 9, Nº 1, summer/fall 1986.
Laing, Ronald David (1968), The Politics of Experience and the Bird of Paradise. Hard cover: London, Tavistock; paperback: Harmondsworth, Pelican.
Leary, Timothy and Richard Alpert, The Psychedelic Experience.
Ruitenbeek, H. M. (Ed.) (1972), Going Crazy: The Radical Therapy of R. D. Laing and Others. New York, Bantam.
3.- Pathology of Relationships and «Schizophrenia»
Bateson, Gregory (recopilation 1979), Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York, Ballantine; London, Paladin.
Bateson, Haley, Weakland and Johnson, Toward a Theory of Schizophrenia. In Bateson, opere citato.
Goffman, Ervin, Asylums. Harmondsworth, Pelican Books.
Haley, Jay, The Family of the Schizophrenic: A Model System.
Laing, R. D., Self and Others. London, Tavistock; Harmondsworth, Pelican.
Laing, R. D., The Politics of the Family. London, Tavistock; Harmondsworth, Pelican.
Laing, R. D. and Aaron Esterson, Sanity, Madness and the Family . Harmondsworth, Pelican.
Laing, Lee, Philipson, Interpersonal Perception.
Scheff, T. J. (Ed.), Mental Illness and Social Process. New York, Harper & Row.
Speck, Ross V. Psychotherapy of the Social Network of a Schizophrenic Family.
Szasz, Thomas, The Myth of Mental Illness. Harmondsworth, Pelican.
Szasz, Thomas, Ideology and Insanity . Harmondsworth, Pelican.
Szchazman, Morton, Soul Murder. Hardmonsworth, Pelican.
Winnincot, D. W., Play and Reality. Harmondsworth, Pelican Books.
Zuk, Gerald and Ivan Borszormenyi-Nagy, Family Therapy and Disturbed Families.
4.- Critique of Modern «Official» Medicine, Alternatives and Proposals
Capra, Fritjof (1982), The Turning Point. New York, Bantam Books.
Capra, Fritjof (1986), Uncommon Wisdom. New York, Simon & Schuster.
Carlson, J., The End of Medicine.
Corea, Gena (1977), The Hidden Malpractice. New York, Morrow.
Dossey, M.D., Larry, Space, Time and Medicine. Boulder, Shambhala Publications.
Dossey, M.D., Larry, Beyond Illness. Boulder, Shambhala Publications.
Dubos, René (1978), Man, Medicine and Environment. New York, Praeger.
Dubos, René (1979), Hippocrates in Modern Dress. In Sobel, David S., opere citato.
Dumont, Jacques and Jean Latouche, L’ hospitalisation, malade du profit.
Dumont, Jacques and Jean Latouche, L’ hôpital, environnement, organisation, gestion.
Foss, Laurence and Kenneth Rothenberg, The Second Medical Revolution.
Fuchs, Victor (1974), Who Shall Live. New York, Basic Books.
Goldsmith, Edouard and Pierre-Marie Brunet, La médicine à la question.
Illich, Ivan D. Némesis Médica. Barcelona, Barral.
Laporte, J. R. and G. Tognoni, Principios de epidemiología del medicamento.
LeShan, Laurence (1977), You Can Fight for Your Life, p. 49 et seq. New York, Evans.
McKeown, Thomas, The Role of Medicine, Dream, Mirage or Nemesis. London, Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust.
Navarro, Vicente (English 1977), La medicina bajo el capitalismo/Medicine Under Capitalism. English: New York, Prodist.
Navarro, Vicente (Ed.), Salud e imperialismo.
Regnier, Dr. François, La médicine: pour ou contre les hommes?
Simonton, Mathews-Simonton and Creighton (1978), Getting Well Again, p. 57 et seq. Los Angeles, Tarcher.
Sobel, David, Ways of Health.
Thomas, Lewis (1975), The Lives of a Cell. New York, Bantam.
Thomas, Lewis (1977), On the Science and Technology of Medicine. In Knowles, John H., Doing Better and Feeling Worse. New York, Norton.
Thomas, Lewis (1979), The Medusa and the Snail. New York, Viking.
Waitzkin, H. B. and B. Waterman, La explotación de la enfermedad en la sociedad capitalista.
5.- Tibetan and Eastern Religion and Medicine
and its Relation to ModernWestern Disciplines
Capriles, Elías (1976), The Direct Path. Providing a Background for Approaching the Practice of rDzogs-chen. Kathmandú, Nepal, Mudra Publishing.
Capriles, Elías (1985), Introducción a la teoría y práctica del budismo tántrico. Caracas, Centro Dzogchén.
Capriles, Elías (1986), Qué somos y adónde vamos. Caracas, Unidad de Extensión de la Facultad de Humanidades y Educación de la Universidad Central de Venezuela.
Capriles, Elías (as yet unpublished), Mind, Society, Ecosystem—Transformation for Survival.
Capriles, Elías (1986, Spanish as yet unpublished), Sabiduría, equidad y paz. Paper read at the First International Encounter for Peace, Disarmament and Peace held in Mérida, Venezuela, in 1986. To be published in Actual , magazine of La Universidad de Los Andes, in 1990. Shorter version published in English and Italian on October 1, 1988, in Rivista MeriGar/MeriGar Review, Arcidosso, Grosseto, Italia.
Capriles, Elías (1986; published in 1990), Las aventuras del fabuloso hombre-máquina. Contra Habermas y la ratio technica. Mérida, Actual (magazine of La Universidad de Los Andes), 1st issue of 1990 (which should have been the last of 1989).
Capriles, Elías (1978; revised several times and finally published in 1990), The Source of Danger is Fear. Mérida, Editorial Reflejos. (Sale restricted.)
Capriles, Elías (based on the original text by Karma Lingpa and on the instructions given by Dudllom Yeshe Dorlle Rinpoché and Lama Thubten Yeshe) (1986), Autoliberación de los seis bardo o «modos de experiencia». Caracas, Ediciones Tigre, León, Garuda y Dragón. (Sale restricted.)
Clifford, Terry (1987), Tibetan Buddhist Medicine and Psychiatry. London, Wisdom.
Dash, Bhagwan (1976), Tibetan Medicine. With Special Reference to Yoga Sataka. Dharamsala, Dist. Kangra, H. P., India, Library of Tibetan Works and Archives.
David-Neel, Alexandra, several works about her experiences in Tibet.
Donden, Yeshi (1987), Health Through Balance: An Introduction to Tibetan Medicine. Ithaca, N. Y., Snow Lion.
Dorje, Namchos Mingyur (Italian 1988), Zhi Khro (introduction, translation and commentary by Namkhai Norbu Rinpoché). Arcidosso, Grosseto, Italia, Shang- Shung edizioni.
Finckh, Elisabeh (1988), Foundations of Tibetan Medicine.
Finckh, Elisabeh (1988), Studies in Tibetan Medicine. Ithaca, N. Y., Snow Lion.
Guénon, René (1945), Le règne de la quantité et les signes des temps. Paris, Gallimard Idées NRF.
Guenther, Herbert V., Life and Teachings of Naropa. Oxford, Oxford University Press, and Boulder, Shambhala Publications.
Karma Ling, Center of Buddhic Meditation, Ed. (Featuring papers by Lama Denis- Toendroup, Dr. Jean-Pierre Schnetzler, Dr. Georges Verne, Mrs. Janine Kiss.) (1983), Bouddhisme et Psychologie Moderne. Actes du Colloque de Karma Ling. Arvillard, Savoie, Éditions Prajna
Lock, Margaret (1980), East Asian Medicine in Urban Japan. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Norbu Rinpoché, Namkhai (1983), On Birth and Life. A Treatise on Tibetan Medicine. Arcidosso, Grosseto, Italia, Shang-Shung Edizioni.
Norbu Rinpoché, Namkhai (1988), gCod. Arcidosso, Grosseto, Italia, Shang-Shung edizioni.
Norbu Rinpoché, Namkhai (Ed.) (1983), Il libro tibetano dei morti. L’antica sapienza dell’Oriente di fronte al Morire e al Rinascere. Roma, Newton Compton.
Norbu Rinpoché, Namkhai (compiled by Manianne Zwollo) (1989), Dreamwork. Amsterdam, Stichting Dzogchen.
Norbu Rinpoché, Namkhai (1986), Lo stato di autoperfezione. Ubaldini Edizioni.
Norbu, Dawa (Ed.) (1976), An Introduction to Tibetan Medicine. New Delhi, Tibetan Review Publications.
Ragpay, Dr. Lobsang, Ph.D. (1987), Tibetan Medicine: A Holistic Approach To Better Health.
Reynolds, John Meredith (1988; publicado en 1989), The Nagas—Ancient Bönpo Teaching and the Nagas. In Rivista Meri Gar/Meri Gar Review, Arcidosso, Grosseto, Italia.
Shah, Idries, Los sufíes (traducción: Pilar Giralt Gorina). Barcelona, Luis de Caralt Editor. English: The Sufis.
Tarthang Tulku (1977), Time, Space and Knowledge. A New Vision of Reality. Emmeryville, Calif., Dharma Publishing.
Tarthang Tulku, Ed. (Featuring papers by Tarthang Tulku, Gay Gaer Luce, Claudio Naranjo, Charles T. Tart, Arthur Sherman, Ralph Davis, Theodore M. Jasnos, Kendra Smith, Peggy Lippitt, James L. Gauer, James Schultz and Tilden H. Edwards, Jr.) (1975), Reflections of Mind. Western Psychology Meets Tibetan Buddhism. Emmeriville, Ca., Dharma Publishing.
Trungpa Rinpoché, Chöguiam, and Francesca Fremantle (1975), The Tibetan Book of the Dead. The Great Liberation Through Hearing in the Bardo. Boulder, Shambhala Publications.
Tsarong, T. J. (1987), Handbook of Traditional Tibetan Drugs: Their Nomenclature, Composition, Use and Dosage.
Tucci, Giuseppe (German 1970; English 1980), The Religions of Tibet. London, Boston and Henley, Routledge & Kegan Paul; Bombay, New Delhi, Calcutta, Madras and Bangalore, Allied Publishers Private Limited.
6.- Reference to Western Philosophical Works
Descartes, René (translation by Manuel García Morente) (this Spanish version, 1976), Discurso del método and Meditaciones metafísicas. Madrid, Espasa-Calpe S. A.
Habermas, Jürgen (1968; Spanish 1982), Conocimiento e interés. Madrid, Taurus.
Sartre, Jean-Paul (31st French edition, 1980), L’être et le néant. Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Paris, Editorial Gallimard, Collection Idées.
Sartre, Jean-Paul, Psychologie de l’imagination. Paris, Gallimard.




Also...
from
G r a h a m H a r v e y' s S h a m a n i s m


No comments:

What I do and have done professionally

Caveats

All original material here is Creative Commons License licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License. All material not originated by the author is used in accordance with acceptable use practices governing public domain, academic study, and not-for-profit cultural development and critique. Any concerns about privacy or copyrights may be addressed by emails directed to public at bdwc dot net.